Several years ago while seeking understanding and hopeful for
affirmation from breeders in the UK, I offered fleece samples and
photographs to all who would take the time to look. I did this with great
trepidation because I had concluded on day one of that trip that whatever
breed my sheep were they were certainly not the same as that which stood
before me in the UK. On more than one occasion I received only the vaguest
hint of encouragement regarding the sheep in my paddocks back in the USA.
"Ah yes, well. Right. Yes. (Long uneasy pause).
Yes, Well I have seen sheep like these (pointing at my
pictures, but not admitting where these sheep might have been seen).
Brilliant sheep aren’t they?
Right! (Another pregnant pause)
Well, lets have a look at some of MY Shetlands as long as
you’ve come this far."
And it did nothing for my self esteem as a Shetland enthusiast when I
caught sight of an entire wall clad in blue and red ribbons. So much for
affirmation.
Some years later in the Shetland Islands, the response was somewhat
more direct;
"Hmm, yes. Quite. Well, I’d say those sheep of yours are simply the
result of indiscriminant breeding. Now let’s go have a look at some
real Shetland Sheep, shall we? You’ve come a long way, haven’t
you?"
As stunned as I was by that comment, I realized that it contained a
clue. By this time I had seen many flocks in the US and far more in
England and Scotland and here we were in the "Homeland" with yet another
perspective on the breed.
It was only after a few years of showing up again and again (usually
rudely and without fair warning) at the doorstep of yet another
unsuspecting breeder in the UK that I began to have a look at ALL
of their sheep. With a more relaxed attitude on subsequent visits,
explorations of the flocks became less structured and I was allowed to see
the rams and ewes lurking here and yonder but always accompanied by
restrictive covenants not to reveal the sources of some of my photos. So,
I will honor my pledge of anonymity but suffice it to say that wavy
double-coated sheep are alive and well in the UK and you may even see a
bit of britch and scadder from to time.
Over time this gave way to the admission by several UK breeders that
they had, indeed, seen sheep like mine. Yes, they had seen Shetlands that
looked like my mini wooly mammoths at home. "Where?" I asked. "Oh, right
here of course, 10 years ago we all had sheep like that. "
And let’s not forget that all the Shetlands in England and Scotland
DID ultimately derive from the Shetland Islands.
But the final piece of the puzzle for me occurred after reading Banks
and Sinclair, when on a visit to England I was invited to see the flock of
a breeder who had eschewed the show ring entirely. These sheep, we could
demonstrate came from good pedigreed stock, and yet, there they were
looking all the world like my Shetlands back home! This breeder had raised
her sheep in the Park Sheep fashion and, left somewhat to their own
devices, it would appear that they had reverted to the phenotype we in
America know so well; the primitive looking tuskless mini-mammoths in my
barnyard.
And so, like the Dailley import that Benji Hunter selected to represent
the Sheep of Shetland and purportedly left the islands looking quite
single-coated and proper from Benji’s standpoint, her sheep, too, had been
"indiscriminately bred" for that particular trait and now, from different
breeding lines, we had come to have the same sheep so to speak,
Indiscriminate breeding. The Zetlander was right. Not in a
condescending way, but rather in the true sense of the word. This English
breeder and I had both neglected to discriminate the "kindly sheep" from
the "beaver sheep" . We had not bred our flocks specifically for the
fleece type that put Shetland Sheep on the map and created the Classic
Shetland of the 18th Century and 19th Century. And,
we certainly had not bred for the traits that characterize the Modern
Commercial Shetland of my friend in Shetland. But, I believe, we all have
Shetland Sheep.
So, my proposal is that Shetland enthusiasts collectively recognize the
great variety of phenotypes that we, as breeders, can pull from the depths
of the Shetland gene pool. That the reservoir of genetic material
underlying the breed contains remnants of contributions from outside the
Islands will always be arguable but is undeniable.
From the very beginning the Sheep of Shetland have been repeatedly
influenced by exogenous genetics. These sheep are surely the result of a
thousand years of Nordic influence amended by genetics from Britain and
Europe in man’s attempt to better the lot of the sheep and people of
Shetland. But, rather than argue endlessly over the validity of our sheep,
we should celebrate this variability that has resulted in a marvelously
hardy, fascinatingly and undeniably variable creature. Each of these
phenotypes can be thought of as a genetic time slice, a phenotypic
snapshot in the development of the Shetland gene pool through time. Each
of these phenotypes is rightly called a Shetland.
From all of this I am driven to conclude that the 1927 Standard for the
breed promulgated by the Shetland Flock Book Society is an appropriately
flexible document against which to benchmark our sheep. It is at once
restrictive enough to keep us all on the correct course of stewardship and
yet flexible enough to allow each one of us to extract from the breed the
variable traits each of us put to such good use in our separate settings.